Describing media as ‘immer­sive’ is ambigu­ous.  From debil­i­tat­ing addic­tion to ther­a­peu­tic relief, media engage­ment holds a clear dual­i­ty in its effect on humanity…

Without an inter­dis­ci­pli­nary char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of “immer­sion”, why do we allow this con­cept to be so read­i­ly invoked in dis­cus­sions of books, visual art, video games, vir­tu­al real­i­ty sys­tems and more?

While “immer­sion” into tra­di­tion­al media con­cerns the con­tem­pla­tive dis­tance of a spec­ta­tor to anoth­er world depict­ed in a writ­ten novel or work of art, con­tem­po­rary tech­nol­o­gists can speak in terms of a vir­tu­al dis­tance which has a per­cep­tu­al ele­ment. If engaged in the social inter­ac­tions and per­cep­tu­al attrib­ut­es of a nov­el­’s image-less, tex­tu­al world, is the reader “immersed”? Alternatively, if par­tic­i­pants enter a highly func­tion­al VR system, with a head-mount­ed dis­play, spa­tial­ized audio and haptic feed­back, but do not believe the illu­sion, are they “immersed”?

The ambi­gu­i­ty sur­round­ing “immer­sion” is a sig­nif­i­cant obsta­cle to research­ing media which lie across lit­er­a­ture, art and tech­nol­o­gy. The present dialec­tic moves from phe­nom­e­no­log­i­cal bound­aries between self, world and other worlds to the­o­ret­i­cal sim­i­lar­i­ties between “immer­sion” as dis­cussed by tra­di­tion­al and inter­ac­tive media the­o­rists. A uni­fy­ing char­ac­ter­i­za­tion is estab­lished and dis­cussed in the con­text of an ongo­ing project which explores bound­aries of what is con­sid­ered “immer­sive”: the Sonic Cradle, a cham­ber com­bin­ing biofeed­back, sen­so­ry depri­va­tion, music and meditation.

Watch a pre­sen­ta­tion of the cross-dis­ci­pli­nary ‘immer­sion’ frame­work below:

» Learn more about ‘Sonic Cradle’, a human-com­put­er inter­face which was inspired by the framework

Media Gallery

[mediatags]immersion[/mediatags]

Publications